Opportunity Should Knock For The Most Qualified, Regardless of Color

There is a group called the black coaches and administrators which  defends the rights and interests of black coaches.  This group is making noise that unless D-1 and D-1A teams hire more black head coaches,  they will go to court and force it to happen.  Excuse me?

I understand and am empathetic with the notion that there should be equal opportunity.  But I also believe that it has to be evolution, not revolution to get it done.  College Presidents are, on the whole, fairly liberal people who are open to the idea of hiring a minority head coach.  The problem is, if you are a big school and want to win right now, do you want to bring in an offensive coordinator with no head coaching experience or a hired gun who makes your program competitive from the day he steps on to campus?

Here's a couple of examples: Alabama had a vacancy for head coach earlier this year.  They hired Nick Saban, a veteran, seasoned head coach with an impressive college football coaching record and a national championship under his belt. Alabama is a program that expects to compete for a national championship every year and plays in arguably the most competitive conference in the country.  Should Saban have not been hired to satisfy somebody's quota?  Should Alabama have hired a black coach with less head coaching experience and less of a track record just to satisfy the demands of a pressure group or did they hire someone who was the most qualified, regardless of color. How about Arizona State's hire of Dennis Erickson?  Again, a seasoned, veteran coach who has won everywhere he's ever been.  Does he get denied opportunity because he is a middle aged white guy?

Something that all of these groups fail to acknowledge is the premium on winning placed on these college football programs.  A winning team the major college is worth millions, including bowl revenue, local radio revenue, ad revenue and so on.  These are the windfalls that keep athletic departments in business in this day and age of budget cuts.  You can't blame programs for hiring veteran coaches over unproven ones, be they black, white or purple.

The NFL has shown us how capable black head coaches can be.  Lovie Smith and Tony Dungy locked up in the Super Bowl last year.  Mike Timlin has done an outstanding job with the Steelers this season.  Herm Edwards has gone to the playoffs with the Jets and Chiefs.  All of these guys were coordinators at one time and all of them had to wait their turn and pay their dues until something opened up.

Here's something else to think about.  Most coaches become a head coach after serving as a defensive or offensive coordinator.  In Chicago and Pittsburgh, the coordinators are both white; In Indianapolis, Tony Dungy's offensive coordinator is white.  Why?  Because these guys want to win and to win they have to hire the best coaches available, regardless of race.

The bottom line here is winning and finding the right individual to lead your program.  With only about 300 or so jobs at this level, the jobs should be based totally on merit, achievement and record and not on either skin color or a court order.  Then maybe some day, we'll be once again talking about head coaches and not about black head coaches.

Lighting Round

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
  • No trackbacks exist for this post.
Comments
  • No comments exist for this post.
Leave a comment

Submitted comments are subject to moderation before being displayed.

 Name

 Email (will not be published)

 Website

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.